Analyzes the cultural attitudes political decisions and institutions surrounding the maintenance of armed forces throughout American history While traditionally Americans view expensive military structure as a poor investment and a threat to liberty they also require a guarantee of that very freedom necessitating the employment of armed forces. Beginning with the seventeenthcentury wars of the English colonies Americans typically increased their military capabilities at the beginning of conflicts only to decrease them at the apparent conclusion of hostilities. In Drawdown The American Way of Postwar a stellar team of military historians argue that the United States sometimes managed effective drawdowns sowing the seeds of future victory that Americans eventually reaped. Yet at other times the drawing down of military capabilities undermined our readiness and flexibility leading to more costly wars and perhaps defeat. The political choice to reduce military capabilities is influenced by AngloAmerican pecuniary decisions and traditional fears of government oppression and it has been haphazard at best throughout American history. These two factors form the basic American amp8220liberty dilemmaamp8221 the vexed relationship between the nation and its military apparatuses from the founding of the first colonies through to present times. With the termination of largescale operations in Iraq and the winnowing of forces in Afghanistan the United States military once again faces a significant drawdown in standing force structure and capabilities. The political and military debate currently raging around how best to affect this force reduction continues to lack a proper historical perspective. This volume aspires to inform this dialogue. Not a traditional military history Drawdown analyzes cultural attitudes political decisions and institutions surrounding the maintenance of armed forces.